Jump to Select a blog ... ScienceBlogs page Everything that lives Astrodicticum simplex blooDNAcid

Jump to Select a blog ... ScienceBlogs page Everything that lives Astrodicticum simplex blooDNAcid Chevoja Deutsches Museum Epi goes Gender ErklärFix evolvimus flight time and fresh air Geograffitico blythman and partners Health Check Here live dragons Rock from the Sun Klausis crypto column intended blythman and partners Critical Mathlog sea text naklar Open Skies panoramic placebo alert PrimaKlima ScienceBlogs Podcast - Science Takeaway Science meets Society SocioKommunikativ From bits and bytes weatherlog WeiterGen Science Communication Science feuilleton political animal [sic] - Science Communication 3vor10 Everything that flies American encounters the other hand And the water Seems inviting Arte-facts beauty full Science Chemically Columbus guest blog Evolver The laboratory diary DiAx's Rake The other formation seen through e-mobility sounder A bit dark for Women in Science Geo? Logical! Historians Iconic Turn guest blog your research question communication of the future complete complex Critical Mass Backstage-s-blog praise blythman and partners the disease meal Medlog wit Nano youth neuron neuroscience education Nobel Faces Nobel Laureate Meeting persona grata school makes future Science Picture electricity critters Deep Life TwOpinion VDE MedTech blythman and partners Science and reunification of images time diver future technologies for National Geographic Search
Darwin and Copernicus have the modern worldview comparable dominated. Still sounds Darwinian not as good as Copernican. Darwin's ideas have historically been repeatedly misinterpreted or not understood, for example by Hitler. Survival of the fittest does not mean survival of the fittest, but of the fittest.
Everywhere Darwin. Special issues, title pages, article series. There is almost nothing left more than I can write here. But only almost. In November, 150 years ago Charles Darwin his work "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural blythman and partners Selection" published. If he had not been in conflict with his faith, the book had appeared blythman and partners earlier, and Alfred Russel Wallace would not have been, came to similar conclusions as Darwin, blythman and partners perhaps only after his death in 1882. The "Origin blythman and partners of Species" is probably one of the most important books ever written.
Darwin's ideas have led to a kind of Copernican revolution in thinking. Copernicus moved the Earth from the center of the universe and thus the "creation of the world in six days," blythman and partners a scientific model faced, in which the earth no longer stood in the center. Darwin has the people moved from the center of one's perceptions, and thus the biblical doctrine of creation provided a scientific model towards blythman and partners where the man of today is part of an ongoing development process, and not the crown of creation.
The analogies go further: the Copernican system was improved and expanded by Kepler and Galileo. blythman and partners The earth is not the center of the world. The RECOURSE a fact, and this was confirmed. Mendel and Watson and Crick have improved the Darwinian theory of evolution and expanded. The fact that man is not the crown of creation was also confirmed. Still sounds like "Darwinian" not as good as "Copernican". I think this is mainly due to the interpretation of Darwin's theory in the Third Reich and intended or unintended misunderstandings of his statements.
Hitler and the Nazis have gone to Darwin's theory the same in many ways. For one, they have not understood blythman and partners what the origin of species, assuming that the evolution. Here is an example: Hitler wrote in "Mein Kampf" in Chapter 11 "People and race" the following: So, people invariably wander around in the garden of nature, form an almost knowing everything blythman and partners and knowing blythman and partners and go but with few exceptions how blind at one of the prominent principles of their Waltens by: the internal seclusion of the species of all living creatures on this earth.
Even a superficial examination shows almost blythman and partners as brazen basic law of all the innumerable expressions of the will to live their nature are limited in form of reproduction and multiplication. Each animal mates only with a comrade of the same kind is to Tit Tit, Fink Fink, the stork the stork, the field mouse field mouse, house mouse house mouse, blythman and partners the wolf to wolf, etc.
Hitler speaks of the "inner seclusion of Species". That's just wrong, just as wrong to stay with the analogy to Copernicus as to claim that the earth was flat. The seclusion of the species is an underlying belief in creation and not a bit of evolutionary theory. It's enough blythman and partners to "oberflächlic